Free Web Hosting by Netfirms
Web Hosting by Netfirms | Free Domain Names by Netfirms


Tibet links page
Plumtree family tree
Page 1 John Plumtree name list
Page 2 John Plumtree name list
Page 3 John Plumtree name list
Yacht Gently log page
About Robert Plumtree page
History Vietnam war 1950 to 1966
Foreign Affairs & Trade
 



Explore this sites photo gallery:

Photo of yacht Gently

Photo Mountain View
Photo of a Mangosteen
Photo of a Longan
Fred Wilson's Tamarillo
Reed Avocado
Photo of a Rose
Robert's yellow Rose
Photo of Stewart Rook
Mum and sister Janine
Photo of Mt Egmont
Helen Plumtree
Family Clive & Carol Plumtree
Photo Mervin Berry
Photo Lee Carter
Bernhard & Heidi Hurschler
Photo Bob Robinson
 



Gyalwa Ensapa Property
:


Photo Gyalwa Ensapa property

Gyalwa Ensapa property 2002
Flushing Logan tree
Yellow Mangosteen tree
Robert building Gompa
 



Brown Swiss photos:


Photo of Lola Brown Swiss cow

Photo of Brown Swiss at Girenbad
Daughter of Lola, Robyn
Robyn in-calf 2006
Daughter of Lola, Lisa 2006
Robyn runner-up Rotorua show



Miscellaneous:  
Photo of lovely coloured bird
Cottage at Sulphur Creek
Link to Thu Le Anh page

robplum blog spot link

 

PRUNUSTOFT

Welcome to Rob Plum's website,
enjoy a thought or two checking out the nature of
our:-

Dualistic mind.

Merely labelled;
mindfully trying to find self
or a truly existent “I” is quite impossible.
Our impermanent physical human form, is constantly changing, our toenails,
cells of form body are constantly changing, all are constantly under-going change, 
every aspect of our being is constantly changing.
Our thoughts, our memories constantly changing.

Some may consider others as an enemy, likely
they are our best teachers...

I agree with Lama, we exist in interdependence,
a changing interdependent cyclical.

The “I” (ego) we so often cling to, is actually a dilution.

Lama Zopa Rinpoche says:

In Buddhism, particularly in Mahayana Buddhism,
the best way of loving oneself is to pull out the root of all problems,
which is right in one's own heart:
the ego, the self-centred mind.
So, if one lets go of cherishing the I,
then it doesn't matter what situation one is experiencing,
the problem becomes non- existent.

– 

Can get really deep.
take your time,
mean while;
thank you for visiting my web, internal pages all have handy links assisting easy exploration.
I sincerely hope you enjoy, relax put the brakes on;

enjoy browsing this site.

The Plumtree family tree and Plumtree name-list information assembled by John Plumtree in the UK is very extensive.

For those interested in His Holiness Dalai Lama Mahayana teachings 
or other Tibet related information; this site has many useful links 
an opportunity to comfortably browse with each link opening a new browser.

 3 Google Photo Albums, bird birdwatchers, lots of Australian birds,  double click on photo thumbnail, and a new browser will load. 
The albums mostly contain photos taken during my recent travels:-  

e500 Photo Album 03.02.08

Album 24.06.07

Ensay.24.12.07 Album

Gently's log, an account of a very brave 20 foot hood's skipper's journey north from Sydney NSW 
to Port Douglas in northern Queensland.

  History of Vietnam War 1950 through to 1966 page, exposes many aspects of the early build-up and outrageous deployment of SEATO forces in predominately 
Mahayana Vietnam.

Find many other photos using the active links in the left-hand column.

Every person has the right to the observance of the principles of natural justice by any tribunal or other public authority which has the power to make a determination in respect of a person’s rights, obligations, or interests protected or recognised by law. A person effected by a determination of any tribunal or other public authority has the right to apply, in accordance with law, for judicial review of that determination accept of course me.
tried in accordance with the laws of New Zealand to obtain my right of lawful discharge from the New Zealand army, thus far without success.

 

The NZ Defence Force continues ongoing deprivation of my lawful entitlements.  

Recently again contacted the office of the Ombudsman raising issues in respect in-action of a department official of the courts. I did that in relation to a document correctly earlier filed with Ombudsman Littlewood before departing NZ in 2004.

A legal document filed with him under section 13 of the Ombudsman Act.

Ombudsman Littlewood in his reply advised that he has had a discussion with the Ministry for Justice.

I then received correspondence from General Manager Higher Courts Andrew Hampton. Within his even more recent correspondence, General Manager Higher Courts in part explains he is unable to comment on judicial proceedings.

This because it is a fundamental principle of our constitutional system that, in order to maintain the integrity of our judiciary, judicial proceedings operate entirely independently from Ministry of Justice officials.

 

A High Court Judge on 16th day of December 2002 at Rotorua, Justice Harrison, did not dismiss my High Court Appeal. The appeal remains active and my lawful correspondence to the Governor General was and remains consistent with Justice Harrison’s decision-making and direct reference to the Governor General during the hearing of appeal. These legal matters recently raised with a Minister in Helen Clarks government related to a soldier’s grievances correctly communicated in accordance with law and filed with the Governor General under sections of the Human Rights Act, Bill of Rights Act and Armed Forces Discipline Act.

Those matters are judicial matters protected as such under the separation of powers expressed within the New Zealand Constitution. Judicial matters are not matters Cabinet or politicians of any persuasion have any right to involve themselves in.
No Minister has a right to impede the lawful duty of a soldier, or either the findings of a High Court Judge or the legal and lawful duty of the Governor General.

 

The document the Honourable Governor General received from Robert Plumtree is and remains a judicial matter that has been lawfully expressed as a matter of law under the Human Rights Act, Bill of Rights Act and Armed Forces Discipline Act. Which are not matters of course Ministers can fiddle with; it is a JUDICIAL MATTER that is supposed to be protected under the separation of powers within the CONSTITUTION ACT 1986

I understand the Constitution Act 1986 is the principal formal statement. The Act first recognises that the Queen – the Sovereign in right of New Zealand – is the Head of State of New Zealand, and that the Governor-General appointed by her is her representative in New Zealand. The legal document I filed with the Governor General is a document filed by a serving soldier in Her Majesties armed forces service. The Governor General is the highest authority of the NZ armed forces at that time left for me to complain to, and the Armed Forces Discipline Act filed with the Governor General demands if the higher authority complained to is unable to resolve the soldier’s grievances he or she must act in accordance with law and take the soldiers grievances to the next higher authority, which in these matters clearly means
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth 11. 

 

The Constitution Act supports relevant decisions of the courts, for instance, upholding the rights of an individual against the powers of the state, and in determining the extent of those powers.

It is my understanding the Cabinet essentially is a body established by convention, it has no legal power; and the House acting alone has very limited powers to make decisions with full legal effect. The courts do, and my actions are consistent with the findings of Justice Harrison of the New Zealand High Court at Rotorua on the 16th day of December 2002. Consistent also with the findings of the General Manager Higher Courts that it is a matter that is a judicial matter.

The office of Governor-General sec. 1.11 of the Letters Patent requires Ministers to keep the Governor-General fully informed about the general conduct of the government, and to furnish the Governor-General with such information as he or she may request on any matter relating to the government of New Zealand.

 

I therefore ask the Minister will you please exercise your prerogative as a Minister of the Crown? Please ask the Honourable Prime Minister to inform the Governor General of the current situation in respect to the legal responsibility of the Commander in Chief of the New Zealand Armed Forces to comply with the laws and the provisions of the New Zealand Constitution?

 

Both the Human Rights Act and the Bill of Rights Act contain other expressed legal rights within the correspondence sent to the Governor-General that I am referring to.

Minister please act to bring my concerns to the attention of Prime Minister Helen Clark as I am been unlawfully being deprived of my rights expressed in the document lawfully filed expressing relevant aspects of the Human Rights Act, Bill of Rights Act and Armed Forces Discipline Act.

 

A respondent to these proceedings listed in the Privacy Commissioners Court, the Minister for Defence, some how perceives a right to act in contempt of the rule of law by brawling in the streets instead of complying with the courts directions and now  interferes with a judicial decision in breach of the separation of powers expressed within the New Zealand Constitution...

Please enjoy your visit.

Cheers and very best wishes from;
Robert